Warning: Article::require_once() [function.Article-require-once]: Unable to allocate memory for pool. in /home/radref/sites/wiki.radicalreference.info/html/includes/Article.php on line 701
Radref site design - Radical Reference Wiki

Radref site design

From Radical Reference Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 22:50, 29 December 2009
MRM (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 00:31, 7 January 2010
MRM (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 7: Line 7:
'''There is also [http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/KW39TYL an online survey] -- please fill it out so we can get everyone's thoughts and ideas!''' '''There is also [http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/KW39TYL an online survey] -- please fill it out so we can get everyone's thoughts and ideas!'''
 +Something else for the to-do list regarding content: Re-organize the [http://radicalreference.info/rrnews Radical Reference in the News] page so that entries are in reverse chronological order rather than alphabetical by publication. (MRM, 1/6/10)
Maybe the navigation menu for non-logged-in users could be: Maybe the navigation menu for non-logged-in users could be:

Revision as of 00:31, 7 January 2010

This is where we'll collate all the ideas for redesigning the Radical Reference site

The next work session for the site redesign/refactoring will be on Tuesday 1/5/10, 2-6pm. Contact nyc (at) radicalreference (dot) info if you want to be involved.

Notes from the 12/19/09 brainstorming/refactoring session.

There is also an online survey -- please fill it out so we can get everyone's thoughts and ideas!

Something else for the to-do list regarding content: Re-organize the Radical Reference in the News page so that entries are in reverse chronological order rather than alphabetical by publication. (MRM, 1/6/10)

Maybe the navigation menu for non-logged-in users could be:

  • Create content

- Question

  • Local Collectives

- [the collectives]

  • Recent posts
  • Presentations
  • Publications
  • Volunteer

- Volunteer guide (MRM, 11/3/09)


(2/9/06) After several responses on the list in favor of the multi-colored tabs, I left them the way they are. JRJ